Lawyers discussing early exit strategy in workers' comp claim case.

The Value of an Early Exit Strategy in Workers’ Compensation Defense: A Practical Approach

In the realm of workers’ compensation defense, many employers instinctively aim for a “take nothing” outcome—seeking to prove the claim has no merit and have the case dismissed entirely. However, while this approach may seem appealing, it often comes at a steep financial and emotional cost. A strategic, early exit through settlement can, in many cases, limit exposure and save significant resources. At Lozano Law Inc., we understand that each case requires a tailored approach—sometimes an aggressive defense is warranted, while other times an early settlement for nuisance value makes better business sense.

Table of Contents

Why Settling Early Can Be the Smarter Move

One of the main advantages of settling early, especially for a nuisance value, is the significant cost savings it offers. Pursuing a “take nothing” verdict through trial can rack up substantial legal expenses, often far exceeding the value of a potential settlement. For example, achieving a full defense victory can cost an employer $50,000 or more in legal fees, expert witness costs, depositions, and trial preparation, whereas settling early for a fraction of that cost—perhaps $10,000 to $20,000—can provide closure with far less financial impact.

Moreover, pursuing a “take nothing” verdict often requires extensive discovery and litigation, which can drag on for months or even years. This not only incurs higher legal costs but also adds stress and uncertainty to your business operations. In contrast, an early settlement allows you to focus on running your business without the distraction of a lengthy legal battle.

When Going to Trial is Necessary

That said, at Lozano Law Inc., we recognize that not every case is suited for an early settlement. When a claim is particularly weak, baseless, or presents high stakes for your business, taking the case to trial may be the right move—especially if the potential exposure exceeds the cost of litigation. In such cases, an aggressive defense is justified, not only to protect your interests but also to send a clear message that your company won’t pay out on frivolous claims.

However, it is important to weigh the cost-benefit analysis of going to trial. Even in cases where a full defense is achieved, the financial and emotional costs may not always justify the victory. As some experts have noted, the value of a “take nothing” verdict can be misleading when factoring in the overall expense to get there.

Is a Meritorious Win Really a Win?

Even in cases where a defense verdict is secured, it’s important to ask whether the win was truly worth the cost. For example, imagine spending $50,000 to secure a “take nothing” result, only to realize the exposure was limited to $20,000. In such cases, settling early for nuisance value would have saved your business a significant amount of money, time, and stress.

Conclusion: Strategic Flexibility is Key

At Lozano Law Inc., we approach every case with strategic flexibility. We evaluate whether an early exit through settlement will provide the best outcome for your business or if an aggressive defense is necessary to limit your exposure and set a precedent. By partnering with us, you’ll receive tailored advice based on a deep understanding of both the legal landscape and the practical realities of workers’ compensation defense.

If you are facing a workers’ compensation claim and want to explore the best strategy for your business—whether that involves an early settlement or a more aggressive approach—reach out to Lozano Law Inc. today. We are here to help you navigate the complexities of workers’ compensation with a focus on protecting your bottom line.

Leading the Way in Workers' Compensation Law

Ready to protect your business and minimize risk in workers’ compensation claims? Contact Lozano Law today for expert guidance and a tailored defense strategy.

Share this post